The Ohio Statehouse has no business telling communities how to regulate plastic-bag use

Plastic bag ban

The Ohio House passed a bill this month that would prohibit plastic-bag regulation in Ohio cities and villages. Meanwhile, Cuyahoga County Council voted this week to allow a six-month grace period on enforcement of its plastic bag ban, which takes effect Jan. 1. In an editorial today, the editorial board writes that plastic-bag bans, fines and like regulation are home-rule matters the Ohio Constitution specifically vests in local communities.

Arguing over whether Ohio should or shouldn’t ban single-use plastic bags isn’t the pivotal issue in House Bill 242, now pending in Ohio’s Senate. The real question is whether General Assembly Republicans have the constitutional right in Ohio to forbid cities and villages – and their voters – from making that decision for themselves.

There’s a simple answer: They don’t.

What’s more, that “home rule” right is more than 100 years old -- and designed by a Clevelander.

The Ohio Constitution’s city and village home rule amendment, which Ohio voters ratified in 1912, was drafted by Newton D. Baker, perhaps Cleveland’s most celebrated mayor.

Before voters ratified home rule, a special interest lobbyist could coax the General Assembly to override a city decision if it displeased that special interest, or if it attacked the graft that special interest sought to protect.

Examples abound: To undermine Toledo Mayor Sam “Golden Rule” Jones, an anti-corruption crusader, the General Assembly tried to deny him control of the Toledo police department. Lawmakers earlier had tried to force a one-sided streetcar franchise on Cincinnati.

In that pre-home-rule era, legislators could safely ignore voters of the cities or villages micromanaged at the Statehouse.

Which brings is to House Bill 242, which Ohio’s House passed 58-35 on Dec. 11. Its prime sponsors are Republican Reps. George Lang, of suburban Cincinnati’s West Chester township, and Don Jones, of Freeport, in Appalachian Ohio’s Harrison County.

Their bill would forbid Ohio’s local governments from imposing “a tax, fee, assessment, or other charge on auxiliary containers," of which plastic or paper bags are examples. It also would also prohibit similar regulation of "the sale, use, or consumption of auxiliary containers, or on the basis of receipts received from the sale of auxiliary containers,” according to the nonpartisan Legislative Service Commission.

The main argument advanced by those who support HB 242 -- and a companion measure, Senate Bill 222 -- is that grocers and other retailers can’t reasonably be expected to cope with an in-state patchwork of anti-littering laws.

That's nonsense. Grocers and other retailers already deal with Ohio’s mosaic of local zoning and planning rules. And to obtain an Ohio alcoholic beverage sales permit from the Division of Liquor Control, a retailer must locate in a precinct whose permit quota isn’t filled – and whose voters haven’t voted it dry.

Yet retailers seem readily able to meet those rules, clearly more complicated than a ban on single-use plastic bags -- which, parenthetically, Pittsburgh’s Giant Eagle, one of Ohio’s major grocery retailers, just embraced, starting in Northeast Ohio and the Columbus suburb of Bexley.

Republican Gov. Mike DeWine also opposes forbidding Ohio communities from banning single-use plastic bags.

I think this would be a mistake," said DeWine, as quoted by cleveland.com’s Andrew J. Tobias, of the proposed state legislation. “I think the state government should allow local communities to do what they think is best in regard to this area."

He’s absolutely right.

There are fair arguments for and against banning single-use plastic bags. But the place to make that decision is at a city, village or township hall, or in a county council chamber – not at the Statehouse.

About our editorials: Editorials express the view of the editorial board of cleveland.com and The Plain Dealer -- the senior leadership and editorial-writing staff. As is traditional, editorials are unsigned and intended to be seen as the voice of the news organization.

Have something to say about this topic?

* Send a letter to the editor, which will be considered for print publication.

* Email general questions about our editorial board or comments on this editorial to Elizabeth Sullivan, director of opinion, at esullivan@cleveland.com.

* Use the comments to share your thoughts. Then, stay informed when readers reply to your comments by using the “Follow” option at the top of the comments, & look for updates via the small blue bell in the lower right as you look at more stories on cleveland.com.

If you purchase a product or register for an account through a link on our site, we may receive compensation. By using this site, you consent to our User Agreement and agree that your clicks, interactions, and personal information may be collected, recorded, and/or stored by us and social media and other third-party partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy.