An LGBT activist in Hawaii had the nerve to tell females if they do not want a boy in their locker room they should use the nurse’s station to change. From The College Fix:
Hawaii’s KITV reports on a controversy at Kamehameha Schools Maui, where a male volleyball athlete started identifying as female and using the girls’ locker room as a result.
School district policy puts no conditions on students who want to use the private changing facilities of the opposite sex. The Hawaii High School Athletic Association established a similar policy nearly two years ago, letting boys compete in girls’ sports with no conditions such as required hormone treatment to level the playing field.
It’s high times for activists such as Dean Hamer, a board member of the Honolulu Gay & Lesbian Cultural Foundation as well as filmmaker and scientist.
If female students are uncomfortable with a biological male getting undressed in their facilities and watching them undress, they have other options, such as a nurse’s station or other room, Hamer told the news station: “Accommodations should be made for them too because everyone should feel comfortable.”
Hamer says it’s not enough for schools to have anti-bullying policies to protect sexual and gender minorities. They need to “show kids and teachers and administrators what a positive affirming atmosphere looks like,” meaning they need to privilege transgender over cisgender students.
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Saw this jewel of a tweet on Hamer’s page:
“The looser of the #DemDebate is @jaketapper, pompous self centered controlling moron”
That’s LOSER–not “looser”. For a self-described “scientist,” Hamer doesn’t have much command of the English grammar, syntax, and spelling, does he?
Definition of pervert (Entry 1 of 2)
transitive verb
1a : to cause to turn aside or away from what is good or true or morally right : CORRUPT
b : to cause to turn aside or away from what is generally done or accepted : MISDIRECT
Hard to argue with Merriam-Webster
And they have been — it’s called the girls’ locker room. Let the “girl” use the nurse’s station, since there’s only one of zir.
Fine. Make accomodations by adding a third locker room. Anyone who doesn’t want to use the locker room that corresponds with the gender on their original birth certificate can use that one. Then NOBODY need feel uncomfortable. Of course, that will probably piss off the LGBTQ crowd, but it solves the problem without trampling on anyone else’s rights.
Wouldn’t the mae girls wherever they go? And these are teenagers -don’t try to tell me the guys aren’t checking out the girls, and probably talking about it to the other guys. The whole point of separate female/male locker rooms is to protect the girls. Who suddenly don’t mnatter anymore!
If you watch the original video, you can see that his tone is nothing like the angry “WE WIN, YOU LOSE” tone that the headline here conveys.
Whatever you think about this issue, you don’t get to make his “everyone should feel comfortable” into some sort of “Let them eat cake” declaration.
There is no such thing as transgender.
The following are “transgender” truths:
• There is no sound science behind the transgender agenda. No “expert” can point to any physiological markers, in any given case, proving that at issue is a biological phenomenon and not a purely psychological one.
• The “transgender” diagnosis is based purely on feelings relating to what’s called strong “cross-gender identification.” It’s no different from a cardiologist performing bypass surgery on a patient — without conducting any medical tests confirming heart disease’s presence — based solely on the person claiming he feels as if he has clogged arteries. Yet on this basis alone a psychiatrist may recommend that a child live as a member of the opposite sex and even, at some point, have body-rending “gender-reassignment surgery” (read: mutilation).
• Strong “cross-gender identification” is defined as “gender dysphoria.” There is also “species dysphoria” — the sense of being an animal stuck in a human body — and Body Integrity Identity Disorder (BIID), the strong sense that a body part or parts don’t belong on/in one’s body (e.g., legs, eyes). All three disorders are defined by “feelings.” There’s no more proof that gender dysphoria has a biological basis than there is that species dysphoria or BIID does.
• To re-engineer society (e.g., open bathrooms to the opposite sex) based on transgender claims is to subordinate the feelings of the vast majority of the population to the feelings of less than one percent of it.
• Proponents of transgender bathroom social engineering argue that such people have been using the opposite sex’s facilities for decades without raising objections. Yet this only proves that these individuals — who convincingly pass as the opposite sex — don’t need a law to gain access. Conclusion: The push to open bathrooms isn’t mainly about access; it’s about changing the way people think. Social engineering is the goal.
• Telling schoolchildren it’s normal to live as the opposite sex is child abuse. It’s as if we told them it’s normal to be species dysphoric and live as an animal: It warps their sense of reality.
• Allowing men claiming woman status into women’s athletic events, on the basis that “hormone-replacement therapy” eliminates any natural advantage, reflects ignorance. The intersex sports-performance gap is profound — the mile record for 15-year-old boys is better than the women’s world record. And boys’ running records surpass those for girls’ even among prepubescent children. Allowing “trans” men into women’s competitions is no different from permitting a 20-stone heavyweight to box as a lightweight because he identifies as a 135-pounder.
• “Gender” and “sex” aren’t synonymous. Even psychologists will tell you that “sex” is a biological distinction while “gender” is merely your perception of what you are. In reality, “gender” should only be applied to grammatical classifications (as it used to be). The quality of being male or female is properly known as “sex.”
Prejudice means to pre-judge and is defined as “an opinion formed beforehand, esp an unfavourable one based on inadequate facts.” For policy to not be based not on prejudice but principle, we must arm ourselves with the facts.