Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Asylum Seekers Say U.S. is Returning Them to the Dangers They Fled

A new agreement allows the United States to transfer asylum seekers to Guatemala — a high-crime country that poses its own risks and offers them little protection.

Yovani and his two daughters have been hiding in a house at a secret location in Honduras.Credit...Daniele Volpe for The New York Times

CORTÉS DEPARTMENT, Honduras — Yovani has a strategy for staying alive: He will not let anyone know he is back in Honduras, he will move homes every couple of weeks and he will stay indoors.

This is how much he fears the gang member who killed his brother, who forced two other close relatives into exile and who, he says, is trying to murder him next.

Yovani, 23, had hoped to apply for asylum in the United States. But when he and his family arrived at the border late last month, American officials diverted them to Guatemala instead.

The action is permitted under a recent accord between the Trump administration and Guatemala. And on Tuesday, the administration began moving to tighten the southwestern border even further in response to the coronavirus crisis, adding another level of uncertainty to the fragile lives of asylum seekers.

The transfer to Guatemala has left Yovani with no good options. Fearing for his safety there, he and his family returned to Honduras. And then they looked for a place to hide.

“We can’t stay in one place,” Yovani said from northern Honduras, where he, his wife and two daughters have lived since earlier this month. He asked that he only be partly identified, and that his precise location be kept secret, because of the threats to his life.

Getting killed in Honduras, he explained, “is super-easy.”

Image
Yovani, left, with his family at a bus station in Guatemala City. He and his wife decided it would be safer to return to Honduras.Credit...Daniele Volpe for The New York Times

Trump administration officials last year created a policy that allows them to send asylum seekers to Guatemala to apply for sanctuary there. Their hope was that it would reduce the number of migrants reaching the United States.

Critics said the deal may be a death sentence for migrants, because Guatemala has high crime rates, a nascent asylum process and few protections for those fleeing threats and violence.

Since the transfers began last November, more than 900 Central Americans have been sent to Guatemala. But only 20 — about two percent — have formally applied for sanctuary there.

The rest have opted instead to face the risks of either returning to their home countries or heading north once again, hoping to find sanctuary in Mexico or try their luck, one more time, at the American border.

Supporters of the Guatemala-United States deal point to the large number of transferees who have left Guatemala as evidence that their asylum cases likely had little merit. Migrants and their advocates, however, say it instead reflects the dangers vulnerable people face because of Guatemala’s weak rule of law.

“To be here is almost the same as being in Honduras,” said Carlos Eduardo Woltke Martínez, a migrants’ advocate in the human rights section of Guatemala’s public prosecutor’s office. “You’re in the same neighborhood of the criminal groups. The conditions here are not a guarantee of your safety.”

Video
bars
0:00/5:21
-0:00

transcript

What Happens When the U.S. Outsources Asylum?

Instead of a court hearing, the Trump administration is giving Central Americans a chance to seek asylum — in Guatemala.

A year ago, this woman says she was paying $500 a month to the MS-13 gang in El Salvador, extortion money to keep her restaurant up and running. Then gang members murdered her son-in-law, and she and her daughter testified against them. In the past, her story might have been grounds for asylum in the United States — or at least an asylum hearing — but not anymore. That’s because the Trump administration is upending the U.S. asylum system. “So that’s a very big thing. It’s a very important signature.” And one way they’re doing it is through a deal with Guatemala, called the Asylum Cooperation Agreement, or ACA. “This landmark agreement will put the coyotes and the smugglers out of business, and stop asylum fraud and abuses.” What this means in practice is that hundreds of asylum seekers from Honduras and El Salvador have been deported, and told to seek refuge in Guatemala instead. But Guatemala is plagued by many of the same problems that people are fleeing in the first place: violence, poverty and corruption. So I came to see what asylum in Guatemala looks like. Once deported under the ACA, asylum seekers arrive at this shelter. Everyone I speak with is confused. They’d made the long journey north only to end up back nearly where they started. The woman I met earlier, the one threatened by MS-13, is also staying at the shelter. She and her daughter are applying for asylum here, but a friend warns her that the gang is tracking them. She’s one of the very few people to pursue an asylum claim here. In fact, only about 16 of more than 900 people have done so. So why does this deal exist? Even Guatemala’s newly elected president, Alejandro Giammattei, acknowledges the deal is political. And he’s right. They don’t want to stay here. It’s too close to home, and asylum here offers little protection or support. The U.S. had pledged to pump $47 million into Guatemala’s asylum system, but it’s unclear how much of that money has been received or how it’s been spent. Nevertheless, more of these deals are in the pipeline. “We entered into historic cooperation agreements with …” Soon, the Trump administration plans to implement asylum deals with Honduras and El Salvador. Those countries are even less prepared. Two days later, I meet up again with the woman who’s running from MS-13. Her situation has already gotten worse. She and her daughter can’t stay at the shelter anymore. They’ve been there a month, and yet their asylum claims could take a few months to a year to process. And that, in the end, may be the point of these deals. For the Trump administration, the goal is to stem the flow of migrants to the U.S., perhaps by convincing them not to come at all.

Video player loading
Instead of a court hearing, the Trump administration is giving Central Americans a chance to seek asylum — in Guatemala.CreditCredit...Brent McDonald/The New York Times

The conditions facing asylum seekers grew even more uncertain on Tuesday, when Trump administration sources said the United States would begin turning back all foreigners trying to illegally cross the southwestern border.

Under the new rule, set to be announced in the next couple of days, border agents would immediately return to Mexico, without due process, asylum seekers and others who try to cross the border between legal ports of entry. The sources said the rule would be in effect as long as the coronavirus remains a threat to the United States.

Until now, under rules currently in place, migrants who have chosen to return to their home countries say that even though they may still be in harm’s way, at least they can enjoy the protection and support offered by close family members and friends, something Guatemala cannot provide.

“The fact that they are not applying for asylum here does not mean they are not at risk,” said Rebeca Cenalmor-Rejas, head of the Guatemala office for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. “Going back to their countries doesn’t mean the threat never existed.”

The agreement between the United States and Guatemala was reached last July. American officials brokered similar deals with the governments of Honduras and El Salvador, though neither of those have been put into effect.

Those three Central American countries were the source of the majority of immigrants arrested trying to cross the southwest border of the United States in fiscal year 2019, and the Trump administration has credited the Guatemala accord with helping to lower migration flows.

In January, however, a coalition of groups led by the American Civil Liberties Union filed suit against the Trump administration saying that the agreements violated American and international law by failing to protect asylum seekers from exposure to harm in Central America. A union representing asylum officers in the United States filed a brief in the case earlier this month in support of the coalition’s argument.

Also this month, Democratic lawmakers in the United States House of Representatives opened an inquiry into the agreements, calling them “illegal, dangerous and antithetical to American values.”

On Tuesday, Guatemalan officials said that owing to the coronavirus pandemic, flights carrying transferees under the accord would be suspended temporarily.

Yovani and his wife were circumspect about the details of the events that drove them from Honduras earlier this year. They said only that a gang member, for reasons they would not detail, began menacing Yovani’s family, killing his brother and forcing his mother and an aunt to seek asylum in the United States.

Image
“The United States is only washing its hands,” Yovani’s wife said of a policy that reroutes asylum seekers to Guatemala. “What they’re doing with Guatemala is getting rid of the migrants.”Credit...Daniele Volpe for The New York Times

When the gang member started to threaten Yovani directly, he said, he fled to the United States with his wife and children. They crossed the Rio Grande illegally in late February and presented themselves to border agents, but said they were never given a chance to make their case for asylum. Instead, within days, they were loaded onto a flight bound for Guatemala.

Upon arrival at the airport in Guatemala City, they were told they could apply for asylum there. If they did not, however, they would have 72 hours to leave the country.

Fearful that the Guatemalan authorities would not be able to protect them from the gang member’s long reach, Yovani and his wife elected to seek safe harbor with trusted relatives in Honduras instead.

“I wanted to ask for asylum — not because of lies but because of something verifiable,” Yovani said the day after his arrival in Guatemala City, as he and his family waited for an overnight bus to Honduras.

Several other Honduran asylum seekers who were recently deported to Guatemala said they had made similar calculations.

“I said, ‘Guatemala?’ It’s the same as Honduras!” recalled Jackeline, 29, a former office worker who was prevented from applying for asylum in the United States with her 10-year-old son. “The difference is that in Guatemala I don’t have relatives.”

Image
Jackeline and her son are Honduran. They were deported from the United States to Guatemala before they could petition for asylum.Credit...Daniele Volpe for The New York Times

Even though a Honduran criminal gang had been trying to forcibly recruit her son, Jackeline said, she decided to return and hide out with her mother until she could gather enough money to fly to Spain and seek asylum there. (That escape route now may be impossible, at least for several months, because of the coronavirus outbreak.)

Only her mother and brother knew she was back in Honduras, she said.

Alicia, 41, a former street vendor, said she and her 17-year-old son were fleeing death threats from a gang member in their town, and hoped to apply for asylum in the United States. But they, too, were given no chance to make their case and were diverted to Guatemala.

“Guatemala is the first place that they would look for me,” she said of the criminal gang in an interview this month in northern Honduras. “They don’t think I’m here.”

Image
Alicia has returned to Honduras after being deported from the United States to Guatemala.Credit...Daniele Volpe for The New York Times

She has told only a few close family members that she is back, and she has sent her son to live with distant relatives on the other side of the country.

Yovani and his family are living temporarily with a close relative, and spending most of each day indoors.

It’s an unsustainable way to live, they acknowledged, but it is the only way they know to avoid danger for now. Yovani thinks his next option may be to stash his wife and daughters with a trustworthy relative somewhere in Honduras and head alone to the United States. This time, however, he will try to sneak in rather than present himself to the border authorities.

In the meantime, the family has been left feeling disposable to countries that, they say, should be offering them protection.

“If something happens to us, the United States continues to be the same country,” Yovani’s wife said. “Honduras, too. Guatemala? The same.”

Zolan Kanno-Youngs, Michael Shear and Maggie Haberman contributed reporting from Washington.

Kirk Semple is a correspondent covering Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean. He is based in Mexico City. More about Kirk Semple

A version of this article appears in print on  , Section A, Page 15 of the New York edition with the headline: Seeking Asylum, But Sent Into Peril. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT